grid

Policy Overview

The Safeguard Mechanism (SM) was established as part of the federal Emissions Reduction Fund in 2016. The mechanism places a legislated obligation on Australia’s largest greenhouse gas emitters (facilities with direct scope 1 emissions of more than 100,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year) to keep net emissions below their emissions baseline. The baseline was initially set based on the highest level of reported emissions for a facility from 2009-14. The federal Government released two consultation papers in March 2018 and September 2018 aimed at bringing emissions baselines up-to-date.

InfluenceMap Query

Emissions Trading; GHG Emission Regulation

Policy Status

Active

Evidence Profile

Key

opposing not supporting mixed/unclear
supporting strongly supporting

Policy Engagement Overview

  • The evidence collected on corporate and industry lobbying on Australia’s SM from 2014-2020 indicates that the most frequent lobbying position has been ‘Not Supporting’.
  • InfluenceMap did not find any evidence of opposition to the SM, but there were 46 cases of entities lobbying for provisions to weaken the scheme, primarily focused on weakening emissions baselines to protect trade competitiveness. This negative lobbying was carried out by a range of companies and industry associations with Ai Group, APPEA and Minerals Council of Australia the most engaged.
  • InfluenceMap found 35 cases of positive lobbying on the SM, 25 of which were by Carbon Market Institute, which has advocated for declining emissions baselines in line with net zero by 2050 since 2018.

Impacts on Policy Ambition

In March and September 2018, the federal Department of the Environment and Energy received over 50 submissions from industry and other organizations to two consultation papers on the operation of the Safeguard Mechanism. In March 2019, the Safeguard Mechanism was updated to bring emissions baselines up to date and allow them to keep pace with business growth, thereby increasing the amount of emissions allowed per facility. The federal government also accepted a recommendation under the King Review to introduce 'Safeguard Mechanism Credits', providing tradeable credits for facilities which reduce emissions below their emissions baselines by undertaking "transformative abatement projects".

InfluenceMap Query

Emissions Trading; GHG Emission Regulation

Policy Status

Active

Evidence Profile

Key

opposing not supporting mixed/unclear
supporting strongly supporting

Live Lobbying Alerts

APPEA argues the Safeguard Mechanism and restrictions on fossil fuel investments are worsening the cost of living crisis

21/04/2023

In a March 2023 consultation response to the Select Committee on Cost of Living, the Australian Petroleum Production & Exploration Association advocated for investments in new fossil fuel supply, suggesting that this would apply downward pressure on energy prices and that any restrictions would amplify the cost of living crisis. Furthermore, it also stated that the recently agreed Safeguard Mechanism design would also contribute to higher prices due to its additional requirements on the fossil fuel sector.

Entities Engaged on Policy

The table below lists the entities tracked by InfluenceMap which have publicly engaged with the policy. InfluenceMap tracks around 300 companies and 150 industry associations globally. Each entity links back to the entities’ full InfluenceMap profile, where the evidence of its engagement can be found.

Influencemap Performance BandOrganizationPolicy PositionPolicy Engagement Intensity