grid

Policy Overview

The Australian Government’s Capacity Investment Scheme (CIS), first announced in December 2022, is an initiative designed to accelerate Australia's transition to a clean energy future. The scheme provides revenue underwriting to renewable energy and energy storage projects and explicitly excludes fossil fuel-based energy. It also aims to ensure Australia’s electricity grid remains reliable and secure as the country phases out coal-fired power and increases its reliance on renewable energy.

In August 2023, the government released a consultation paper on the proposed approach and design of the CIS. In November 2023, the Albanese government announced that it would expand the CIS to underwrite 32 gigawatts of new electricity by 2030. Following the announcement, the Australian Government released a design paper on an expanded CIS in February 2024, which focuses on the implementation design and products, and shares the findings of the August 2023 consultation. Submissions on the design paper closed in March 2024.

This policy tracker page contains details on the combined corporate engagement on both federal consultations on the CIS.

Recent Developments:

  • On 15 October 2024, the Coalition announced that it would open the Capacity Investment Scheme to new and existing fossil gas power plants if its wins the 2025 Federal election thereby pledging taxpayer funds to expand the role of fossil gas in the electricity grid. All fossil fuels are currently excluded from accessing public funds through the CIS.

InfluenceMap Query

Energy Transition & Zero Carbon Technologies

Policy Status

Consultation process complete - Public comment period on the expanded CIS closed on 25th March 2024

Evidence Profile

Key

opposing not supporting mixed/unclear
supporting strongly supporting

Policy Engagement Overview

InfluenceMap’s analysis of responses to the consultations on the Capacity Investment Scheme in 2023/2024 revealed both supportive and oppositional positions from a range of companies and associations from multiple sectors. InfluenceMap assessed 34 individual consultation responses across the two consultations and found 13 to be supportive (38%) of the expanded CIS and 8 to be oppositional (23%), with 13 submissions containing both supportive and unsupportive positions. Note that the evidence profile includes evidence from other sources related to the CIS from other data sources, including but not limited to direct engagement with policymakers.

Policy Engagement Trends

  • A number of companies and renewable energy associations were supportive of the policy. Iberdrola and the Smart Energy Council strongly supported the CIS’s intent to expand renewables and reduce fossil fuels in the energy mix, while Tesla advocated for the scheme to be legislated and to be expanded beyond its initial 6GW capacity target and 2030 end date. A number of other entities such as Acciona, Engie, Enel, Clean Energy Council and Fortescue Metals Group were also generally supportive of the proposed scheme in their consultation submissions.

  • However, companies and industry associations from the fossil fuel value chain in Australia largely demonstrated oppositional positions on the policy and advocated for the inclusion of fossil fuels, particularly fossil gas, in the scheme. Entities which supported the inclusion of fossil fuels in the policy include EnergyAustralia, Origin Energy, APA Group, the Australian Pipelines and Gas Association and the Energy Users Association of Australia. While the Australian Energy Producers and Senex Energy did not publicly engage with the CIS consultations, both did advocate for fossil gas power generation to be included in the CIS in April 2024 consultation submissions on the government’s Electricity and Energy Sector Plan Discussion Paper. Many of these oppositional responses also contained advocacy in favour of expanding fossil gas projects and investment in Australia.

  • While a number of companies and associations appeared to support elements of the scheme, they also advocated several provisions to the policy that risk undermining the objectives of the policy. Shell appeared to support an expansion of the scheme to include biofuel and ‘renewable gas technologies’, yet while it specifically supported the exclusion of coal, it is unclear if Shell is supportive of the exclusion of other fossil fuels, such as fossil gas. Rio Tinto’s position was similar, as it advocated for the inclusion of ‘low carbon firming technologies’ in the scheme, without clearly stating what energy types this would include. In addition, several companies and associations emphasized the need for the scheme to be designed in a way that does not inadvertently bring forward fossil fuel project closures. For example, although AGL supported the aims of the scheme in facilitating Australia's clean energy transition, it also highlighted the risks of fast-tracking thermal asset closures, while also stating that "policies of this nature are typically technology neutral". The Australian Energy Council likewise emphasized the schemes potential impact on existing fossil fuel projects, noting it risks bringing forward closure of "existing dispatchable capacity".

Latest Engagement Trends

* Sevearl companies and industry associations representing the fossil fuel value chain, including Origin Energy, the Australian Energy Producers and the Energy Users Association of Australia supported the Coalition Party's commitment to include fossil gas in the scheme if it wins the 2025 Federal Election.

InfluenceMap Query

Energy Transition & Zero Carbon Technologies

Policy Status

Consultation process complete - Public comment period on the expanded CIS closed on 25th March 2024

Evidence Profile

Key

opposing not supporting mixed/unclear
supporting strongly supporting

Live Lobbying Alerts

Australian Energy Producers advocate for fossil gas expansion ahead of Australian elections

06/03/2025

On 26 February, the Australian Energy Producers Strongly supporting maintenance of high GHG emissions energy mix released a plan for Australia’s Economic and Energy Security, calling for new fossil gas supply ahead of the federal election, which must be held by 17 May. The report argues that increased gas production would ease cost-of-living pressures, reduce emissions, and support continued exports. It also appears to advocate for weakening the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act to fast-track fossil fuel approvals and for including gas in the Opposing renewable energy standards Capacity Investment Scheme, a mechanism designed to incentivize renewables.

Australian Energy Producers Criticize Renewables-Only Capacity Investment Scheme

13/02/2025

On 12 February, the Australian Parliament reached an agreement between Labor and the Greens to ensure that the Capacity Investment Scheme includes at least 23 gigawatts of wind and solar energy and 9 gigawatts of clean storage, effectively ruling out fossil gas from the policy.

This decision follows sustained advocacy from the fossil fuel sector, which had pushed for fossil gas to be included. In response, the CEO of Australian Energy Producers criticized the move in a 13 February press release, claiming the government had 'capitulated to the Greens’ anti-gas agenda', and arguing that urgent investment in new fossil gas supply is needed.

Energy Users Association of Australia advocates inclusion of fossil gas in Capacity Investment Scheme

24/10/2024

In a media release published 16 October, the Energy Users Association of Australia (EUAA) supported the Liberal–National Coalition’s proposal to widen the scope of the Capacity Investment Scheme (CIS) to include fossil gas, stating that Australia has “an urgent need for more gas.” The CEO of the EUAA, Andrew Richards, added that fossil gas was “a critical enabler to realise a least cost transition to net zero.” The CIS, which currently excludes all fossil fuels, was launched last year as a national framework to encourage new investment in renewable and clean dispatchable capacity.

Australian oil and gas players stress the need for policy to support new fossil fuel supply in Australia

04/04/2024

At the Australian Domestic Gas Outlook Conference, held from March 25-28, several oil and gas entities spoke strongly on the need for government policy to support fossil fuels. APA Group CEO Adam Watson was reported by the AFR to have stated that the need for new fossil gas supply is “desperate”, while Senex Energy CEO Ian Davies was quoted in RenewEconomy to have called for fossil fuels to be included in the Capacity Investment Mechanism, a renewable subsidy scheme. Woodside also stated that “new export-scale gas projects are needed, while the CEO of the Australian Energy Producers, Samantha McCulloch used her speech to criticize the lack of recognition for fossil gas in policies including the Hydrogen Headstart and Victoria’s ban on gas connections. Further, the CEO of the Energy Users Association of Australia was reported by the AFR to have criticized Victoria’s gas ban by claiming it has increased emissions by preventing the closure of coal power plants.

Entities Engaged on Policy

Influencemap Performance BandOrganizationPolicy PositionPolicy Engagement Intensity